Ed. Note: We disabled comments for this because the same "anonymous" trolls (yeah, morons, anyone can figure out your IPs are the same) spent most of their early morning trying to sound like 20 different people who agreed with Cracked...none of whom could spell. Way to dispel the notion that Cracked readers are tools, folks! We're not sure what's more pathetic...A HUGE website that probably makes in a month what we sorry bastards do in a year being concerned with us, or the fact that it may just be two of their fans?! I mean...if we keep poaching ideas off little blogs, does that mean we get our own cadre of douchebags to white-knight'ingly defend our honor someday? 'Cause really, that's all we're really working for anyway.
Hey, Cracked?
Yeah, you.
Yes...YOU guys, who tanked at being the poor man's Mad Magazine, then tanked at being the poor man's Maxim, and are currently tanking on what can only be described as a SHERMAN level at being the bankrupt homeless guy's CollegeHumor.com. I know you can hear me. And I have a message for you:
Lick my hairy, musty taint, you crassholes. You are fucking DEAD to me.
"Is it too late to start running?"It wasn't always this way. I used to be okay with you. I really did. And, you probably won't remember this, but you used to be pretty okay with me, too. Quite awhile ago, I decided I was going to try to write for you. And this was LONG before you opened up your front page to any Tom, Dick or Dickless with enough electrical activity in their limbic system to twitch individual keyboard buttons in something like a recognizable sequence.
"i EM MakIn a crakt TOPEX pagez LOL" A few years back, I was a regular commenter in your article threads. And within a few weeks of signing up, you guys had noticed. I know this, because you used to quote me in quite a few of your week-end wrap-ups. You even called me a "super-poster" once.
Right here, actually. As a matter of fact, you liked my comments so much that
riiiiight over here, you singled out ANOTHER one as your
number #7 funniest reader comment of 2007!Yesiree, I figured I was maneuvering myself into a pretty good position to make a solid bid for staff membership...Keeping it low-key, making with the chuckles, and establishing a presence. So, I readied my application letter, and figured I'd fire it off within a few days of being singled out for that little nod of year-end recognition.
Then, all at once, you sold out.
Or, more factually, you joined forces with a FAR lower-rent "humor" site. I don't remember which one. I think it was called, "Meaningless Squandering of Valuable Daylight" or some such bullshit. I'm still not sure how it all went down, exactly. All I remember is that literally overnight, your site comments went from reasonably-funny stuff from a handful of mostly-smart posters, to little more than misspelled slurs from a cesspool of sub-eBaum's World mongoloids who made the average YouTube commenter look like a Nobel laureate.
"Sometimes...I wear MITTENS."
Needless to say, I was disappointed. Not only would any comments I made from that point on be more or less immediately shunted off of the bottom of the screen and lost, buried 'neath a miasma of mediocrity, but I no longer had much interest in writing for a site so thoroughly overrun by gormless, window-licking CHUDs. So, I slunk away defeated with my tail between my legs, and left Cracked's comments threads to the spambots, the flamer trolls, and the 12-year-olds who think that they have to say "nigger," "faggot," or "bitch" every eleven seconds or their parents will die.
For weeks I wandered the cyber-wastes, looking for a new spigot of ha-ha's to call home. A fresh venue to ply my trade. And that's when I found the magnificent Diary of Fools. When I rapped on the front door with the last of my strength, begging for alms in a creaky, dust-dry voice, no less than Blaine Fridley himself answered the door. He saw my pathetic, withered frame, and took me in. He cradled me in his manly arms, and nursed me back to health by suckling me on HIS OWN NIPPLES, tenderly building my strength until I was ready to take my first fledgling steps into trying to be funny again. And I will NEVER forget his generosity. Since that day, the Diary has been my home.
[Ed. - I'm not proud of it. But it was the right thing to do.]
Sure, our audience is smaller. Sure, we're not rolling in whores and nose candy. And sure, we couldn't get a link posted on Digg if I grabbed Kevin Rose's balls and squeezed until he agreed. But fuck it...at least I can SLEEP at night. I'm PROUD of our content and our audience. And I'm sure as hell not debasing myself writing articles like "The Top Seven Vegetables That Alter The Smell of your Pee (hint: five-and-a-half of them are asparagus LOL)."
Though it all, though, I've kept an eye on you. I've held my chin up and worked hard on crafting good, solid funny with MY crew, even as I've watched you tossers rise to prominence on the backs of endless "Top X" lists, sub-Fark photoshop contests, and hack scribbling so cringe-inducing, the "Hollywood Squares" writers would boo you out of the room.
But lately, you fucking fart-sucking ass-nuggets have really started to
piss me off.
"Uh-ohhhhh."
It all started in earnest a few months ago, when we here at the Diary decided to start speckling our banter with some original video shorts. We got together, brainstormed, and came up with what we thought were a few pretty funny ideas. After that, the wheels turned pretty fast. One of our valuable contributors (Knarf Black XIV) is a talented professional videographer, so we busted out the lights and camera, and got down to some totally-chaste, completely-platonic, fully-clothed man-on-man action.
The resultant short, called "Would You Fuck Your Own Clone?", was a valiant first effort. We spent quite a bit of time on what we felt was a good script. Dig some of the lines:
MERTON Assuming that the end result of the whole clone thing is bound to be spare parts and slave labor, it stands to reason that clones wouldn't have any real human rights, per se. So you could pretty much fuck the shit out of your own clone, and there's not much anyone could really say about it.
BLAINE Wait...Fuck your OWN clone?
MERTON Yeah.
BLAINE As in, a human copy of yourself.
MERTON I'm pretty sure that's what they mean by "clone."
BLAINE I think I've officially moved past "confused" into a whole new category.
MERTON Tell me you wouldn't fuck your own clone.
BLAINE No. Just...No.
MERTON Really? Why not?
BLAINE Well, for starters, I'm not gay. And if I was, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be into dudes who looked like ME.
MERTON Who said anything about "gay?"
BLAINE Well, clone or not...A guy is a guy. And I don't have sex with guys. Sorry to disappoint you.
MERTON I'm not into guys, either. But fucking your clone wouldn't be like actually fucking another guy. It'd pretty much just be a hyper-meta form of masturbation. It is basically YOU after all.
BLAINE Yes. Me. A.K.A.: A GUY.
MERTON A guy who knows EXACTLY what you like!
|
We touched on a lot of relevant themes, mostly revolving around the opinion that you could have sex with your own clone, and it wouldn't be gay at all...more like the ultimate form of spankin' it. It was funny, it looked and sounded solid, and when we shot it, we were happy with it.
Unfortunately, when Knarf sat down to cut the footage together, the hard drive on his computer chose that precise moment to commit suicide.
"GOOD-BYE, CRUEL WORLD (abort, retry, fail?)."
So, yeah. Minor setback, that. But, he was eventually able to recover the footage by going back to the original tapes. Then, as soon as his new hard drive arrived, firmly attached to the shell of the narcoleptic tortoise that had been dispatched from Outer Mongolia to carry it to him across the molasses fields of Siberia, he got back on it.
Soon, we had a rough cut we could all be proud of. Knarf, Reno, Blaine and I even got together to watch it. At that point, we were mere days away from bringing our hot, fresh content to our twelve readers, and they were going to love it. And I'll never forget the date, either. It was November 19th, 2009.
And the reason I remember? Because
this abortion showed up on Cracked the very. Next. Day:
Check out that view-count number in case you'd like to put a precise integer on my frustration.What in the greasy purple Jesus-buttering
FUCK?!?Essentially, this nancy-boy "Daniel O'Brien" at Cracked put up an article that explored the identical concept, and he did it the DAY after we'd finished the video. And it wasn't just that the idea was the same...it was almost like he'd been hiding in the goddamned closet when we shot the motherfucker. In his pedestrian little essay, O'Brien ran down the list, and ticked off every single joke we had made in our video, more or less conceptually verbatim, and in
practically the same sequence.Needless to say, we were pretty put out. I mean, yeah...at the end of the day, maybe it wasn't the world's
single most original concept (turns out that if you Google, "would you fuck your own clone," you get a lot of old hits), but nevertheless. The timing SUCKED. We had just wasted a few weeks meticulously piecing together what was to be our debut live-action "DoF-TV" post, only to have the rug yanked out from under us at the last possible moment by a bunch of list-humping fucks who any of us could write circles around even after suffering a massive cranial embolism.
At that point, we were in a tough spot. If we'd finished it? At BEST, we'd look not just derivative...but derivative of some of the worst dreck on the internet. Essentially, we'd be the online equivalent of a Nickelback tribute band. So, we made the tough choice to scrap it. Since then, we've moved back to square one, still yet to decide what our next move is on the original video short front.
"Not that I really object to square one. It is the only numbered square in the game. At least you know your position. Nobody ever screws up and goes, 'Well, back to oval seven'." - Jerry Seinfeld.(See, Cracked? That's what it looks like when you
give proper credit to the source of a joke. Maybe you oughta be taking notes?)
"Mother...FUCKER!"
Which brings us to today.
Some of you may recall my Wednesday "Champions of Society" post this week, sub-titled:
"Welcome Our New Sex Robot Overlords." It was based on a recent news story about a guy who had worked on a sex android named "Roxxxy." An android that he claimed was pretty lifelike, due to the fact that you could talk to it, that it had a self-warming system, and that it could even simulate orgasm when you had sex with it...just like a real woman (ba-ding!). I thought a story like that deserved the ol' Diary do-up. So, I did it.
It seemed to go over pretty well, too. I even got some nice feedback on the article from our modest-but-proud readership, which felt great. But...it proved to be a very short-lived high. Reason being, I logged into Fark.com today, and saw a link to
THIS aberration:
Oh, you fucking SON OF A BITCH
Once again, it seems as though the orangutans at Cracked had stolen our thunder...and once again, it was the monkey known as "Daniel O'Brien" in particular. I felt my blood pressure start to go up.
"Hey, wait..." I told myself. "That was a pretty widely-covered story. It was on CNN, for chrissakes." I tried to convince myself that despite Cracked's track record for seemingly fucking me over personally, this was just another coincidence.
Then, I fucked up. I actually read the article.
And now I am not happy all over again.
Look, I'm not saying Cracked is ripping us off specifically. Heavens, no. I mean, it sure
seems like they are, but...maybe they're not. I guess I'll let you be the judge:
Diary of Fools, Feb. 3rd, '10: "...Roxxy's computer is also able to allow her to simulate an orgasm - both through vocal sounds, as well as a motor that allows her to 'shudder.'...Sorry, but this is ultimately a SEX TOY. So I utterly fail to see the point of either of those in this context. Do you really think the kind of guy who is so hard up that he needs to drop 7K on a receptacle really gives a shit whether she talks back, or gets off?" |
Cracked.com, Feb. 5th, '10: "...The inventor also claims that Roxxxy "even shudders to simulate orgasm," which seems like a fairly irrelevant inclusion. I’m pretty sure that the kind of guy who drops seven grand on a soulless sex receptacle is also the kind of guy who doesn’t care if it orgasms." |
Uh...huh.
And it doesn't stop there.
Diary of Fools, Feb. 3rd, '10: "In addition to being ready, willing and able to satisfy a customer's 'needs' via her anatomically-correct orifices, she also has a specialized computer inside that li'l rubbery head. A computer that can understand what you are saying to it, and respond with any of several hundred appropriate phrases." |
Cracked.com, Feb. 5th, '10: "When you speak to her, your speech is converted to text, which her internal computers analyze using her unique pattern-recognition software. She then comes up with an appropriate response from her database of hundreds of prerecorded responses." |
Diary of Fools, Feb. 3rd, '10: "While I can accept that there are dudes out there who are so unlucky with women that they can see spending the kind of money you could take a years' worth of nice singles' cruises with on a life-size, realistic faux femme to put the wood to...I have a hard time wrapping my brain around the level of sheer, abject loneliness-spiked desperation that would drive someone to not only want said ersatz lass to climax right along with him, but to also cuddle and chat afterwards." |
Cracked.com, Feb. 5th, '10: "I’d always imagined that the popularity of Real Dolls and other competing titles in the doll-pork market was due to lonely guys who enjoyed the act of having sex with a woman but either didn’t have time for or couldn’t navigate around the tricky aspects like 'emotional connection' and 'human interaction'." |
Diary of Fools, Feb. 3rd, '10: "I mean...I know that based on tech trends, human nature, and several decades worth of sci-fi, a 'sex droid' is absolutely inevitable. I get that." |
Cracked.com, Feb. 5th, '10: "If Roxxxy outsells Real Dolls, it means consumers prefer lifelike dolls, which means a doll even more lifelike than Roxxxy will be even more successful, until we get sex robots that seem to have total autonomy."
|
Diary of Fools, Feb. 3rd, '10: "[She's] affectionately named "Roxxxy." Her list price? Around $7,000...Since news of Roxxxy first hit the market, there's been a considerable interest. According to Creepy McDollfucker up there, more than 4,000 men have placed pre-orders for bone-bots, and another 20,000 or so have requested information." |
Cracked.com, Feb. 5th, '10: "Roxxxy boasts an advanced artificial intelligence. She costs around $7000 and has already been pre-ordered by over 4,000 men."
|
Nice work, you guys. That's some reeeealy stellar shit. Maybe after you finish stealing penny candy from the mom-and-pop drugstore that's been on the verge of bankruptcy since Nixon resigned, you can go and knock over some old ladies and grab their purses. Perhaps go to the shelter and kick around a few puppies with your steel-toed workboots on.
Ironically, even though the dick-hole who's getting twenty times our hits with one-twentieth the talent is the one named "O'Brien," I'm starting to understand how Conan felt. That is: overshadowed and ripped off by an artless bully who enjoys inexplicable popularity and boundless credit, despite the fact that he sucks harder than a harbor-side hooker during weekend shore leave. And to FURTHER stretch the metaphor, I don't even have a Jimmy Kimmel on my side to take Leno to the boards, and scold him for throwing his weight around and stomping on the little guy.
So, in short...FUCK YOU, Cracked. Fuck you in the
NECK. You guys aren't worth a sniff of the damp rag I use to mop the sweat off of my cartoonishly gigantic testicles.
Y'know, my grandmother used to say, "If you don't have anything nice to say about someone, shut your fucking smart little mouth." And she was an awesome lady. So, I suppose if there's any one complimentary thing I CAN say about you guys, it's this: at least you're staying true to your roots. You started your life as a shameless, ragtag crew of outright plagiarists, and you still are.
"What, ME worry?"